From Big Screen to Little Screen

A recent failure in the cooling system of my television has rendered it dead. While I’m waiting for it be repaired, I’ve had to get my fix from online video streaming sites. At first I was skeptical because of the past attempts and poor interfaces, such as ads running concurrently as well as lack of full episodes.

Over the past week, I’ve used a few ad driven sites; hulu.com, abc.com, and cbs.com. Hulu.com and CBS.com offer the best experience from my perspective.

Picture 2.png

Hulu.com has the cleanest overall interface. It offers both TV episodes and movies. Both in clip form and full length. You click and it starts playing. You do have to watch commercials, each ranging about 15 to 30 seconds. You have to watch about two minutes worth for a 30 minute episode.

Hulu’s player is slick, you have your typical play/pause/forward/rewind options, but you also have the option to go fullscreen. Something else they introduce is to dim the lights, which will grey out the rest of the screen. That’s a nice little feature to focus on the video.

Streaming started almost immediately and required no installation since Hulu is making use of Flash. The quality was great as well. I did notice some pixellation when I switched to full screen, but that may have been my connection speed at the time.

With shows just coming back, it was difficult to judge how up to date the content was. It does appear as if content is being added on a daily basis, some of it syndicated shows.

Picture 3.png

I did manage to find up to date episodes as well as HD quality on ABC’s site. I’m not convinced it’s 1080i as I would expect from my cable provider, but more like 480p. ABC also decided to package the Flash application into a custom wrapper, so I had to grant permission to ABC to install this application in order to play. That’s definitely a knock against ABC.

Once installed, I had to wait 30 seconds for the player to load up two carousels, one related to ABC shows available for viewing and another smaller one related to clips from the episode I was watching. The former was pointless, I’ve already selected the show I wanted to watch.

Once episode played, the quality was good, the streamed content was delivered without any delays. I watched about three minutes of commercials, which is not bad at all. Each one after a 8 to 10 minute block. The only annoying part of commercials was that when thirty seconds were up, I had to click a button to continue watching my episode. The reason behind this is that the commercials were not necessarily 30 seconds long, its just was ABC set as the minimum viewing time. Hulu on the other hand seems to have reformatted to integrate seamlessly.

Picture 1.png

CBS’s take was similar to Hulu, get users to the content and make it easy to play. Again, no custom Flash installation, full screen good quality video and about two minutes of commercial. Like Hulu, CBS delivered content almost immediately. None of them really offer an innovation of viewing experience, but they do translate the experience of my DVR and TV screen to my browser screen.

Ranking the options, Hulu is first, CBS second, and ABC third. What’s great though is that they are all viable options for watching episodes. I’m not yet convinced that I can cancel my cable subscription, but its no longer a never, its just a not yet.

Posted in technology, tv | Leave a comment

The NCAA March Madness Begins…

32 games, 2 days, players fighting for the prize, simply AWESOME. My brackets are locked and loaded, here’s hoping for Kansas!

Posted in ncaa, sports | Leave a comment

In Search of a Home

I have recently been searching for a house to purchase. Not being familiar with all the cities in my state, its been a struggle to understand what town is best for my family. Here are some of tools I’ve been using to help me narrow down where and what the general value of a home is:

  • Zillow - Find neighborhoods, property tax, city demographics, crime, and school system information.
  • Trulia - Find neighborhoods, property tax, city demographics, crime, and school system information. The presentation of data is different than Zillow. Both are great.
  • CNN Money - General resources and calculators.
  • Motley Fool - Solid breakdown of mortgages and other financial tidbits about your home.
  • ASHI - American Society of Home Inspectors. Help you find an inspector in your area.
  • Domania - How much houses have sold for in your neighborhood. Remember, the property valuation by the city accessor does not mean that is how much a house would sell for. It’s all about market based pricing.

Remember these are tools to help you figure out where, but its best to use professionals like Real Estate agents when you’re ready to buy.

Posted in tools | Leave a comment

Hacking RFID credit cards for $8

BoingBoing TV has posted up a little demo of how easy cracking the RFID encryption on an American Express card can be. All it takes is an $8 dollar reader easily available on eBay, some software, and the courage to walk around with a laptop waving plastic boxes

via Engadget

To this day, I don’t understand why credit cards and other magnetic strips need to store so much personal information on the card. Why isn’t storing the credit card number only enough these days? We know it works, because I can type in my credit card number into my Amazon order form and they can figure out how to charge me.

Posted in technology | 1 Comment

Time Machine Extreme!

Time Machine Extreme is here, unofficially. With the latest Airport Extreme update, Time Machine Update, and Airport update, Time Machine will recognize AirDisks as valid drives to backup on. This is a huge feature. I’ve always ran nightly backups using SuperDuper! and Time Machine using a local USB drive. With Time Machine running remotely, both my wife’s machine and my machine are always backed up. SuperDuper! backups can act as a secondary backup to Time Machine.

As you should expect, your data sent rate is going to increase when a backup is occurring. Activity Monitor is reporting about 532KB/sec on average right now. I do not notice any lag on my laptop or the network so it is considerate of bandwidth.

tm.png

Update: Expect the first backup to take a while.

Found via Engadet.

Posted in apple, technology | 1 Comment

Apple’s Use of Three

In the beginning of the year I’ve had two friends request assistance in finding a laptop for them. Both of them users of Windows based laptops and looking to find a laptop that is five pounds or less, decently fast, and will last a couple of years. My friends had budgets, one around $1500, and one around $1000.

I won’t deny it, I am a long time Apple user because I find their products to be a good fit and allow me to be productive. That being said, I needed to understand what my friends are comfortable with to ensure they buy a laptop that they’ll use and not be frustrated with.

One of my friends was set on purchasing a Windows based laptop because it was familiar to her and she wanted to be able to work from home with the laptop. I started a several week adventure to hunt down a Windows laptop.

I try to keep myself informed of the Windows, Linux, and Mac world, but I didn’t realize how much I didn’t know when I started this search. The first place I decided to look was CNET’s Laptops Review section. I was immediately bombarded with filtering criteria; Refine your results by cost ranges, companies, and product aspects. Selecting the $900 to $1000 option yielded 200 some odd options, holy smokes! The CNET ratings didn’t really inform me as a user why a given laptop was good, it enumerated the features as if just having the features was enough. Sad that some equate quantity to quality. Looking at a few other sites like PC magazines and other technology sites made me feel since the Windows market is saturated with different manufacturers, it was going to be difficult to get a recommendation. Even random selection of laptops resulted in a build to order price of greater than $1200 with a slow processor and Windows Vista, which I didn’t want.

I eventually took a different approach. I used consumer deal sites Techbargains and Dealnews to spot laptop sales. Then I would use Tom’s Hardware reviews and forum sections to find out the nitty gritty details.

The one computer that did come up often at the time was the Dell Vostro. There wasn’t much information on it, either folks stated they liked it, or that it was an Inspiron equivalent. Went to Dell’s website and built out a decent laptop with a 2.2GHz processor, 2GB of memory, plenty of harddrive space, a nice 14″ screen, a 85 WHr 9-cell battery, as well as a integrated camera. All for $1080.71. Perfect!

The frustrating part was that it took several weeks to get to this product because there were too many options, too much customization of products, and lack of good reviews. I suspect a first time buyer will end up purchasing a cheap laptop that will not meet their needs or an expensive laptop because the guy at Best Buy recommended it to them to sell more units.

Going back to my other friend who had a $1500 budget, I asked her what she was going to use it for. She responded back with email, browsing, writing documents, and photo editing. Spending a few minutes with her to explain the difference using an Apple product, she was willing to give it a shot, as well as visit the local Apple store to try before buying (smart!). The product selection process was fantastic thanks to Apple’s use of three.

Going to the Apple’s online store you have three laptops to select from. Each are distinguishable by their look and price. The MacBook fit into my friend’s price range.

store1.png

Again, I am presented with three options. Do I want lower end MacBook with a slower processor, less memory, and a Combo Drive, or the middle one with an up to date processor, more memory, and a DVD burner drive? The side by side comparison with respective pricing helps you understand the value you are getting. There are many other benefits Apple can tout such as Leopard, but they stick with the basics.

store2.png

Selecting the middle one leads you to a build to order screen if you want to customize your laptop. Majority of the time, you won’t, Apple has targeted the most common options already for you. Unfortunately in my PC buying experience, I had to always make changes to the specification.

This is the beauty of Apple’s use of three; provide the user with a low, middle, high options that are distinguishable.

* If you’re looking for a Windows based laptop, check out Dell’s Vostro as well as Lenovo’s Thinkpad. Both companies offer solid options for around $1000. Good luck!

Posted in apple, technology | 1 Comment

Audio Rays

More fun with Processing, this time utilizing the Ess library to analyze Apologize by OneRepublic. Each spoke of the radial utilizes a band in the audio spectrum to determine its length. The result is a beating image.

Posted in images, visualization | 3 Comments

Curls

I’ve been heavily interested in information graphics as of late. I came across a great tool that has been around for quite a few years now, Processing, that enables you to create visualizations of different types; some interactive, some works of art.

The image below is my initial attempts at creating some art.

Curls

Update: A video version can be found at Vimeo.

Posted in images, software, visualization | Leave a comment

No Takes Longer To Process Than Yes

I accidentally left a mailing list form checked when I registered at Wine.com. Since then I have been getting daily emails from them about their promotions. I really haven’t been reading them so I unsubscribed this morning. In the unsubscribe section of the email, it explicitly states that it will take up to 10 days to process the unsubscribe request.

If you would like to be removed from our mailing list, please reply to
this email or click here: mailto:remove-ctg@message.wine.com, and add
“UNSUBSCRIBE” to the subject line. Please allow up to 10 days for your
request to be processed.

Really!? It takes up to 10 days for your mailing list agent to pick up a email from your email server, read the subject line ‘UNSUBSCRIBE’, the from field, and then delete the entry in the subscription database. Maybe the email is printed out, sent to a mailing list center in India, where the email must be read in by a Customer Service representative. Who must go to a warehouse that is filled with index cards, each with a subscriber’s email address, find the card, and rip it up. That must be it.

Ok, ok, it’s not that bad, they just want to send me a few more emails to convince me to purchase more, I would have love to have had a reason for how long it takes to process.

Posted in random, ue | Leave a comment

Apple’s Earnings : Whose Forecast Matters?

After Apple announced it’s earnings for first quarter of 2008, it’s shares tumbled, around 14% over the past two days. Part of which can be accounted for by the panic trading over a US recession, NASDAQ dropped around 6%. Reading over several publications, majority of them cited reasons as iPod sales were flat and or Apple’s forecast for the next quarter was too conservative, almost a low balling tactic by Apple.

From Smart Money:

At Caris & Co., analyst Shebly Seyrafi cut his rating on Apple’s stock to above average from buy, and also shaved his target price to $165 a share from $225. Among the reasons Seyrafi gave for his actions were what he called “disappointing” iPod sales in the company’s first quarter.

and NY Times:

What is worrisome, Mr. Sacconaghi said, is whether the flat domestic iPod sales are a harbinger of things to come for other Apple products.

“That’s the big question,” he said. “If they feel it here, could they feel it in other products and other parts of the world?”

Flat and disappointing are inaccurate words to use. Stating the iPod unit sales have slowed down would be more accurate. On top of that, Apple’s revenue on iPods still grew 5%, thanks to the iPod Touch. It’s likely that iPod Touch sales are going to continue to increase, taking away from iPod Nano and iPod Classic sales, most of which has to do with consumer’s desire for an iPhone like interface and widescreen display. If Apple’s continues to profit and increase revenue, should this be considered a bad thing? I wouldn’t normally think so.

Another aspect to consider is market saturation. Apple dominates the portable media player market putting consumers in a position to choose amongst iPod products, which almost all play both music and videos now. If you already own an iPod, which you upgrade your iPod every year then? Likely not, which will force Apple’s unit sales to approach a limit. Closer it gets to the limit, the slower the overall growth in unit sales. Apple will still gain new customers, get customers to upgrade, generate revenue, just not at the same pace as the last few years.

Analyst’s forecasts seem to overshadow Apple’s own forecast to the point where they become the market expectation.

From Marketwatch:

“The company is lowballing the Street on the March quarter, but this is not a good environment to lowball the market,” said Romeo Dator, who manages U.S. Global Investors All-American Equity Fund (GBTFX:
25.16, +0.05, +0.2%) and owns Apple stock as part of the fund. “The future stock price will depend on continued strong sales of products and what new products they will be releasing this year.”

“IPods were surprisingly light despite fairly radical [product] refreshes,” said Shaw Wu, of American Technology Research. “Macs were strong, but I think investors were looking for more.”

So whose responsibility is it to forecast Apple’s earnings? Isn’t it Apple’s? Apple is the one responsible for building the product, selling the product, accounting for all the operating expenses to generate the revenue in the first place. Why can’t they be conservative? Are they stating a loss? No. Could they make a greater profit than they expected, maybe, and that would be great. The factors that need to be included in the forecast are post-holiday revenue dips for consumer product companies as well as potential iPod market saturation. Its fair for an analyst to form their own forecast, but the forecast should be based their own outlook and advice for the market, not to ding Apple when they didn’t achieve something they never agreed to in the first place.

Looking at Apple’s revenue since 2002, the 2nd quarter is equal to or less than the 1st quarter. Starting in 2005, the gap between the quarters started to expand. Maybe Apple’s forecast is indeed plausible.

appl-chart.png

Maybe I’m just being a naive here in thinking that a growth slowdown shouldn’t be considered a failure.

If you want to read a solid breakdown of Apple’s recent result, you can check them out at Daring Fireball.

Posted in apple | Leave a comment